Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Hacksaw Gaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Raging Waterfall Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Le Hooligan is Cluster pays. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.34% — Raging Waterfall Megaways™ is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Raging Waterfall Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Le Hooligan reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Raging Waterfall Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Wild Falls is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Add to the comparison (up to four)