Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Raging Waterfall Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Wild Falls
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mystic Potion
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Raging Waterfall Megaways™ vs Wild Falls
- Different format families: Raging Waterfall Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Wild Falls is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Raging Waterfall Megaways™ vs Mystic Potion
- Different format families: Raging Waterfall Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Mystic Potion is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.70% — Mystic Potion is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mystic Potion does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
