Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Release the Kraken

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.50%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

Mahjong 88

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.62%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
5,000×
Reels
0
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

Fortune Horse

PG Soft

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.76%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
3
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Release the Kraken vs Mahjong 88

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.62% — Mahjong 88 is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 5,000×, with Release the Kraken higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Mahjong 88 returns more in theory over the long run, while Release the Kraken reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Release the Kraken vs Fortune Horse

  • Different format families: Release the Kraken is Fixed paylines, Fortune Horse is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.76% — Fortune Horse is 0.26 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Fortune Horse does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)