Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Revenge of Loki Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Viking Runecraft: Apocalypse
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Norse myth, Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Revenge of Loki Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Viking Runecraft: Apocalypse is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.51% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Revenge of Loki Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Viking Runecraft: Apocalypse reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
