Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Rise of Pyramids
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 95.97%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Spellbinding Mystery
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Rise of Pyramids vs Spellbinding Mystery
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 95.97% against 96.04% — Spellbinding Mystery is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 10,000×, with Spellbinding Mystery higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Rise of Pyramids vs Le Hooligan
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.97% against 96.34% — Le Hooligan is 0.37 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 10,000×, with Le Hooligan higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
