Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Running Sushi
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mining Pots of Gold™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Outsourced
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Running Sushi vs Mining Pots of Gold™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 96.00%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Running Sushi vs Outsourced
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.08% — Outsourced is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 3,000× against 5,000×, with Outsourced higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
