Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Spellbinding Mystery
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Ice Pop Party
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,044×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Music & party
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.55% — Ice Pop Party is 0.51 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 5,044×, with Spellbinding Mystery higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Ice Pop Party returns more in theory over the long run, while Spellbinding Mystery reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
