Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Microgaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.55% — Ice Pop Party is 0.51 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 5,044×, with Spellbinding Mystery higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Ice Pop Party returns more in theory over the long run, while Spellbinding Mystery reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Spellbinding Mystery is Cluster pays, Xmas Magic is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.50% — Xmas Magic is 0.46 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 20,000×, with Xmas Magic higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Shared theme signals: Fantasy.

Add to the comparison (up to four)