Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Starlight Princess Pachi
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Starz Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Starlight Princess Pachi vs Starz Megaways™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.48% — Starz Megaways™ is 0.44 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 10,000×, with Starz Megaways™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Starlight Princess Pachi vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
