Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Microgaming

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 95.91% — Starlight Wins is 0.59 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 100,000× against 50,000×, with Starlight Wins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: High against Very high. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.

Different format families: Starlight Wins is Cascading reels, Galaxy Miner is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.78% — Galaxy Miner is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 20.0×: 100,000× against 5,000×, with Starlight Wins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Galaxy Miner does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Galaxy Miner returns more in theory over the long run, while Starlight Wins reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Add to the comparison (up to four)