Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Sugar Rush is Cascading reels, Honey Rush is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 5,000× against 9,000×, with Honey Rush higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Different format families: Sugar Rush is Cascading reels, Coins of Fortune is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.48%.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 5,000× against 6,015×, with Coins of Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Coins of Fortune does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sugar Rush returns more in theory over the long run, while Coins of Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)