Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Booongo

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Sugar Rush 1000 is Cascading reels, Candy Superwin is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.53% against 96.73% — Candy Superwin is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 25,000× against 50,000×, with Candy Superwin higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Candy Superwin does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Different format families: Sugar Rush 1000 is Cascading reels, Sugar Teddy x1000 is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Sugar Teddy x1000 does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Sugar Teddy x1000 does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Add to the comparison (up to four)