Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sugar Rush 1000
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Candy Superwin
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.73%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Sweet Kingdom
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Sugar Rush 1000 vs Candy Superwin
- Different format families: Sugar Rush 1000 is Cascading reels, Candy Superwin is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.53% against 96.73% — Candy Superwin is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 25,000× against 50,000×, with Candy Superwin higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Candy Superwin does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Sugar Rush 1000 vs Sweet Kingdom
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.53% against 96.52%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 25,000× against 10,000×, with Sugar Rush 1000 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
