Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sugar Rush 1000
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Honey Rush Black and Yellow
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Sugar Rush 1000 is Cascading reels, Honey Rush Black and Yellow is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.53% against 96.25% — Sugar Rush 1000 is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 25,000× against 20,000×, with Sugar Rush 1000 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
