Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Hacksaw Gaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Sumo Supreme Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Supreme Zeus is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.39% — Sumo Supreme Megaways™ is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 12,500× and 12,500×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Supreme Zeus does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sumo Supreme Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Supreme Zeus reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Sumo Supreme Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Wild Falls is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.55% against 96.50%.
Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 12,500× against 10,000×, with Sumo Supreme Megaways™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Add to the comparison (up to four)