Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Super 7s
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,040×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Joker's Jewels
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,040×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Gem Saviour
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.82%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Super 7s vs Joker's Jewels
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,040× and 1,040×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Super 7s vs Gem Saviour
- Different format families: Super 7s is Fixed paylines, Gem Saviour is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.82% — Gem Saviour is 0.32 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,040× and 1,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gem Saviour does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Gem Saviour returns more in theory over the long run, while Super 7s reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
