Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Super 7s
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,040×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Joker's Jewels
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,040×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Hugo Goal
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 800×
- Reels
- 800
- Theme signals
- Sports
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Super 7s vs Joker's Jewels
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,040× and 1,040×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Super 7s vs Hugo Goal
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 1,040× against 800×, with Super 7s higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Hugo Goal returns more in theory over the long run, while Super 7s reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
