Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Super Tiki Strike
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Stompin’ Gold
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.20% — Super Tiki Strike is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 50,000× and 50,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Super Tiki Strike returns more in theory over the long run, while Stompin’ Gold reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
