Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Super X
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 9,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Sand and Ashes
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.27%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Forbidden Alchemy
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.68%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 8,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Super X vs Sand and Ashes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.56% against 96.27% — Super X is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 9,000× against 10,000×, with Sand and Ashes higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Sand and Ashes does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Super X returns more in theory over the long run, while Sand and Ashes reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Super X vs Forbidden Alchemy
- Different format families: Super X is Fixed paylines, Forbidden Alchemy is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.56% against 96.68% — Forbidden Alchemy is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 9,000× against 8,000×, with Super X higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Forbidden Alchemy does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Forbidden Alchemy returns more in theory over the long run, while Super X reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
