Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Sweet Bonanza is Cascading reels, Candy Burst is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.49% against 96.95% — Candy Burst is 0.46 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 21,175× against 15,000×, with Sweet Bonanza higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Candy Burst does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Candy Burst returns more in theory over the long run, while Sweet Bonanza reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Different format families: Sweet Bonanza is Cascading reels, King of Sweets is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.49% against 96.20% — Sweet Bonanza is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 4.2×: 21,175× against 5,000×, with Sweet Bonanza higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Add to the comparison (up to four)