Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sweet Bonanza 1000
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets, Animals
VS
Piggy Heist
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 70,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Sweet Bonanza 1000 is Cascading reels, Piggy Heist is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.53% against 96.25% — Sweet Bonanza 1000 is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.8×: 25,000× against 70,000×, with Piggy Heist higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sweet Bonanza 1000 returns more in theory over the long run, while Piggy Heist reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
