Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sweet Bonanza 1000
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets, Animals
VS
Sweet Bonanza Super Scatter
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.53% against 96.51%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 25,000× against 50,000×, with Sweet Bonanza Super Scatter higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sweet Bonanza 1000 returns more in theory over the long run, while Sweet Bonanza Super Scatter reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets, Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
