Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sweet Bonanza 2500
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets, Animals
VS
Sugar Rush Super Scatter
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.58% — Sugar Rush Super Scatter is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 25,000× against 50,000×, with Sugar Rush Super Scatter higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets, Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
