Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sweet Bonanza Super Scatter
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets, Animals
VS
Honey Rush 100
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Sweet Bonanza Super Scatter is Cascading reels, Honey Rush 100 is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.20% — Sweet Bonanza Super Scatter is 0.31 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 50,000× and 50,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sweet Bonanza Super Scatter returns more in theory over the long run, while Honey Rush 100 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
