Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sweet Bonanza Xmas
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 21,175×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
King of Sweets
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Sweet Bonanza Xmas is Cascading reels, King of Sweets is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.49% against 96.20% — Sweet Bonanza Xmas is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 4.2×: 21,175× against 5,000×, with Sweet Bonanza Xmas higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
