Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Microgaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Sugar Mania 8000 does not publish one.
Volatility labels differ: High against Very high. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Different format families: Sweet Craze is Cluster pays, Riches of Robin is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 97.54% against 96.65% — Sweet Craze is 0.89 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sweet Craze returns more in theory over the long run, while Riches of Robin reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)