Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Booongo

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Sweet Kingdom is Cascading reels, Sweet Alchemy 2 is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.20% — Sweet Kingdom is 0.32 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sweet Kingdom returns more in theory over the long run, while Sweet Alchemy 2 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Different format families: Sweet Kingdom is Cascading reels, Sugar Teddy x1000 is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Sugar Teddy x1000 does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Sugar Teddy x1000 does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Add to the comparison (up to four)