Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Hacksaw Gaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Sweet Kingdom is Cascading reels, Sweet Alchemy 2 is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.20% — Sweet Kingdom is 0.32 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sweet Kingdom returns more in theory over the long run, while Sweet Alchemy 2 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Different format families: Sweet Kingdom is Cascading reels, Le Hooligan is Cluster pays. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.34% — Sweet Kingdom is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sweet Kingdom returns more in theory over the long run, while Le Hooligan reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)