Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sweet Kingdom
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Sweet Rush Bonanza
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Sweet Kingdom vs Sweet Rush Bonanza
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.52% against 96.50%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 5,000×, with Sweet Kingdom higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Sweet Kingdom vs Le Hooligan
- Different format families: Sweet Kingdom is Cascading reels, Le Hooligan is Cluster pays. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.34% — Sweet Kingdom is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sweet Kingdom returns more in theory over the long run, while Le Hooligan reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
