Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 95.01% against 96.09% — Sugar Supreme Powernudge is 1.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility labels differ: High against Very high. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Different format families: Sweet Powernudge is Cluster pays, Chocolate Deluxe is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 95.01% against 96.75% — Chocolate Deluxe is 1.74 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Chocolate Deluxe does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Add to the comparison (up to four)