Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sword of Ares
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.40%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Frozen Gems
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.36%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Sword of Ares is Cascading reels, Frozen Gems is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.40% against 96.36%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sword of Ares returns more in theory over the long run, while Frozen Gems reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
