Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Tales of Egypt
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 94.11%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,200×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Doom of Egypt
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 94.11% against 96.21% — Doom of Egypt is 2.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.4×: 1,200× against 500×, with Tales of Egypt higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Tales of Egypt does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Doom of Egypt returns more in theory over the long run, while Tales of Egypt reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Egypt.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
