Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
The Catfather
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 2,251×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Great Rhino
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 900×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Mermaids Millions
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
The Catfather vs Great Rhino
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.52% against 96.53%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 2,251× against 900×, with The Catfather higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Great Rhino returns more in theory over the long run, while The Catfather reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
The Catfather vs Mermaids Millions
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.52% against 96.56%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
