Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
The Dog House Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 27,300×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Loot & Labyrinths
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.39%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: The Dog House Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Loot & Labyrinths is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.39% — The Dog House Megaways™ is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 27,300× against 20,000×, with The Dog House Megaways™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
