Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
The Dog House - Royal Hunt
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 8,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Wild Falls
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.53% against 96.50%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 8,000× against 10,000×, with Wild Falls higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. The Dog House - Royal Hunt returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Falls reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
