Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Trees of Treasure

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.10%
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
15,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Adventure, Wealth
Free demo available →
VS

Tiger's Treasure

Microgaming

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
Not published
Reels
3
Theme signals
East Asia, Adventure, Wealth
Free demo available →
VS

Gnaw'n Gold

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.24%
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
40,000×
Reels
5
Theme signals
Wealth
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Trees of Treasure vs Tiger's Treasure

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: Tiger's Treasure does not publish one.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
  • Shared theme signals: Adventure, Wealth.

Trees of Treasure vs Gnaw'n Gold

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.10% against 96.24% — Gnaw'n Gold is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 2.7×: 15,000× against 40,000×, with Gnaw'n Gold higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
  • Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)