Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Triple Dragons
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,300×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Forge of Fortunes
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Funky Fortunez
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Triple Dragons vs Forge of Fortunes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.20% — Triple Dragons is 0.31 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.9×: 1,300× against 2,500×, with Forge of Fortunes higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Triple Dragons returns more in theory over the long run, while Forge of Fortunes reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Triple Dragons vs Funky Fortunez
- Different format families: Triple Dragons is Fixed paylines, Funky Fortunez is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.74% — Funky Fortunez is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 1,300× against 2,000×, with Funky Fortunez higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Funky Fortunez does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
