Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Triple Pot Diamond
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.57%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Supreme Zeus
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.39%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 12,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
VS
xWays Hoarder xSplit®
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,030×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Triple Pot Diamond vs Supreme Zeus
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.57% against 96.39% — Triple Pot Diamond is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 10,000× against 12,500×, with Supreme Zeus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Supreme Zeus does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Triple Pot Diamond returns more in theory over the long run, while Supreme Zeus reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Triple Pot Diamond vs xWays Hoarder xSplit®
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.57% against 96.14% — Triple Pot Diamond is 0.43 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 10,000× against 11,030×, with xWays Hoarder xSplit® higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: xWays Hoarder xSplit® does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Triple Pot Diamond returns more in theory over the long run, while xWays Hoarder xSplit® reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
