Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Triple Pot Gold
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Fire Stampede
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 4,275×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Outsourced
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Triple Pot Gold vs Fire Stampede
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.02% against 96.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 5,000× against 4,275×, with Triple Pot Gold higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Triple Pot Gold vs Outsourced
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.02% against 96.08% — Outsourced is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
