Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Tundra's Fortune
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 12,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Idol of Fortune
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.20% — Idol of Fortune is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 12,500× against 10,000×, with Tundra's Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Idol of Fortune returns more in theory over the long run, while Tundra's Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
