Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.62% against 96.21% — Ultra Burn is 0.41 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Ultra Burn returns more in theory over the long run, while Doom of Egypt reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Ultra Burn is Fixed paylines, Tesla Jolt is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.62% against 96.61%.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 500× against 582×, with Tesla Jolt higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Tesla Jolt does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Ultra Burn returns more in theory over the long run, while Tesla Jolt reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)