Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Vegas Nights

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.05%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
3,558×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Magic Piggy OG

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
2,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Fantasy, Animals
VS

Tractor Beam

Nolimit City

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.01%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
3,408×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Vegas Nights vs Magic Piggy OG

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.20% — Magic Piggy OG is 0.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 3,558× against 2,500×, with Vegas Nights higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Magic Piggy OG returns more in theory over the long run, while Vegas Nights reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Vegas Nights vs Tractor Beam

  • Different format families: Vegas Nights is Fixed paylines, Tractor Beam is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.05% against 96.01%.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 3,558× and 3,408×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Tractor Beam does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)