Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Vegas Nights
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 3,558×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Money Dragon
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Vegas Nights vs Money Dragon
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.05% against 96.07%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Vegas Nights vs Magic Piggy OG
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.20% — Magic Piggy OG is 0.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 3,558× against 2,500×, with Vegas Nights higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Magic Piggy OG returns more in theory over the long run, while Vegas Nights reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




