Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Vegas Nights
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 3,558×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Baker's Treat
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Vegas Nights vs Baker's Treat
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.05% against 96.03%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 3,558× against 5,000×, with Baker's Treat higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Vegas Nights returns more in theory over the long run, while Baker's Treat reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Vegas Nights vs Money Dragon
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.05% against 96.07%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




