Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Viking Forge
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Thor Hammer Time
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,328×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Viking Forge vs Thor Hammer Time
- Different format families: Viking Forge is Cascading reels, Thor Hammer Time is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.05% against 96.03%.
- Win caps differ by about 4.3×: 10,000× against 2,328×, with Viking Forge higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Thor Hammer Time does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Viking Forge vs Grug Make Fire
- Different format families: Viking Forge is Cascading reels, Grug Make Fire is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.19% — Grug Make Fire is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Grug Make Fire does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
