Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Hacksaw Gaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Waves of Poseidon is Cascading reels, Forge of Wealth is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.74% — Forge of Wealth is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Forge of Wealth does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Different format families: Waves of Poseidon is Cascading reels, Supreme Zeus is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.39% — Waves of Poseidon is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 5,000× against 12,500×, with Supreme Zeus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Supreme Zeus does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Waves of Poseidon returns more in theory over the long run, while Supreme Zeus reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Greek myth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)