Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wheel of Happiness
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Candy Stars
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets, Sci-fi & neon
VS
Fire Rooster
Habanero
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 3,690×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wheel of Happiness vs Candy Stars
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.47% against 96.47%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 4,000× against 5,000×, with Candy Stars higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Wheel of Happiness vs Fire Rooster
- Different format families: Wheel of Happiness is Cascading reels, Fire Rooster is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.47% against 86.00% — Wheel of Happiness is 10.47 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 4,000× and 3,690×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
