Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Booster
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Wild Depths
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Coins of Fortune
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 6,015×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wild Booster vs Wild Depths
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.47% against 96.48%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Wild Booster vs Coins of Fortune
- Different format families: Wild Booster is Fixed paylines, Coins of Fortune is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.47% against 96.48%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 5,000× against 6,015×, with Coins of Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Coins of Fortune does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
