Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Gladiators
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Heavenly Elephant Fortune
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.27%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals, Wealth
VS
Hot Safari
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wild Gladiators vs Heavenly Elephant Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.17% against 96.27% — Heavenly Elephant Fortune is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 4,000× against 10,000×, with Heavenly Elephant Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Wild Gladiators vs Hot Safari
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.17% against 96.17%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 4,000× and 4,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
