Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Gladiators
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Hot Safari
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Tomb of Nefertiti
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,768×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wild Gladiators vs Hot Safari
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.17% against 96.17%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 4,000× and 4,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Wild Gladiators vs Tomb of Nefertiti
- Different format families: Wild Gladiators is Fixed paylines, Tomb of Nefertiti is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.17% against 96.19%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 4,000× and 3,768×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Tomb of Nefertiti does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Tomb of Nefertiti returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Gladiators reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
